Comments on: Shutterstock raise details http://www.mangiaphoto.com/shutterstock-raise-details/2008/05/13/ stock photography, compare stock sites, buy photos, read news about stock sites, cameras, etc. Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:47:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: drx http://www.mangiaphoto.com/shutterstock-raise-details/2008/05/13/comment-page-1/#comment-11023 drx Fri, 16 May 2008 07:31:44 +0000 http://www.mangiaphoto.com/shutterstock-raise-details/2008/05/13/#comment-11023 More credits for hi res images is a must! More credits for hi res images is a must!

]]> By: mangia http://www.mangiaphoto.com/shutterstock-raise-details/2008/05/13/comment-page-1/#comment-10933 mangia Tue, 13 May 2008 21:49:01 +0000 http://www.mangiaphoto.com/shutterstock-raise-details/2008/05/13/#comment-10933 First thank you for your comment. Second Yes it is a raise and I'm glad to hear this but USD every worth less and less (in other countries) every day. Last year 1 USD was 1.78 BAM and now it is 1.22 BAM. I hope you get it :) First thank you for your comment.

Second
Yes it is a raise and I’m glad to hear this but USD every worth less and less (in other countries) every day. Last year 1 USD was 1.78 BAM and now it is 1.22 BAM. I hope you get it :)

]]> By: CJPhoto http://www.mangiaphoto.com/shutterstock-raise-details/2008/05/13/comment-page-1/#comment-10926 CJPhoto Tue, 13 May 2008 20:16:00 +0000 http://www.mangiaphoto.com/shutterstock-raise-details/2008/05/13/#comment-10926 A 10% year on year increase is a raise. For some it is a 20% raise. It may not be what you want, and it may not equalise them to other microsites but everyone will keep submitting to them because they have the turnover which makes their earnings hign dispite the low per picture amount. I still think they need need to change their structure so that large photos earn more than one credit. I can see why the simple structure is seen as a positive to purchasers and SS (due to lower admin) but I think Purchasers would be happier to pay more for larger photos. My 3c opinion anyway (thats half my payrise on 1 photo ;) ) A 10% year on year increase is a raise. For some it is a 20% raise.

It may not be what you want, and it may not equalise them to other microsites but everyone will keep submitting to them because they have the turnover which makes their earnings hign dispite the low per picture amount.

I still think they need need to change their structure so that large photos earn more than one credit. I can see why the simple structure is seen as a positive to purchasers and SS (due to lower admin) but I think Purchasers would be happier to pay more for larger photos.

My 3c opinion anyway (thats half my payrise on 1 photo ;) )

]]>